The table below shows the number of language learners who used different methods of learning English between the years 2000 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Modes of learning Years
2000 2004 2008
School 4,000 3,550 2,567
Online 1,567 2,534 5,067
Self-study 2,067 1,523 1,034
Private classes 2,526 2,344 1,456
The given table delineates the comparison of types of learning english chosen by learners from 2000 to 2008. Overall, online learning tended to increase significantly whereas learning at schools, self-study and joining private classes witnessed a continuous fall over the years.
In 2000, the highest number of language learners who went to schools was at 4,000 students, followed closely by those who joined private classes, accounting for 2,526 students. learning online, however, was the least option for learners which attracted only 1,567 students.
Turning to 2004, there was a remarkable downfall in learning english at schools, private classes or self-study, staying at 3,550; 2,344 and 1,523 students respectively . Meanwhile, online courses continued the upward trend to reach at 2,534 students.
With regards to 2008, a number of students who learned english via the Internet shot up substantially to peak at 5,067 students. In the interim, learning registrations at schools, private classes and self-study simultaneously took a nosedive to bottom at 2,567; 1,456 and 1,034 students respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-27 | thongnguyen | 82 | view |
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by tax 84
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting on the main features and make comparison where relevant 88
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and g 89
- The table below shows the number of language learners who used different methods of learning English between the years 2000 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Modes of learni 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learning
...classes, accounting for 2,526 students. learning online, however, was the least option f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...0; 2,344 and 1,523 students respectively . Meanwhile, online courses continued the...
^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...sses and self-study simultaneously took a nosedive to bottom at 2,567; 1,456 and 1,034 stu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 1.0 24.0651302605 4% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 1615.20841683 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 166.0 315.596192385 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71084337349 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9216034621 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632530120482 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 506.74238477 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3608219792 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197584450958 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103479272303 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789782492516 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131606933906 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605100482712 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.