taking a gap year
It is true that in some countries, students often take a few years off after finishing their high school studies for working before studying at university. While this tendency is conducive to several positive outcomes, I would maintain that it is overall a negative development.
On the one hand, taking years out before starting university is beneficial in some ways. For one, this can give students a chance to further develop their skills. For example, students can participate in a volunteer experience domestically or in another country for an extended period, which helps them to gain a lot of real experience and skills in their chosen profession. As a result, people are likely to acquire maturity and well perform when enrolled in university. Another advantage is that by working, young people will be able to earn money as soon as possible. In fact, during that year there would be a chance to earn money to help with college expenses, and since students will likely be mature enough, they will be able to live independently on their income, which helps them save a huge amount of money for their family.
On the other hand, I believe that such merits are negated by the following drawbacks. It must first be recognized that several students are disrupted their studies after a few years working. In fact, the time off is too long and students have a lack of interest in the study. As a result, young people are likely to drop out of college in order to continue their works. In addition to this, the life out of the university campus may prove to be mentally and physically overwhelming for inexperienced school - leavers. They, for instance, may be at risk of being exploited in an exhausting job or face potential dangers on their trips to a new country. If not well-prepared for such possible obstacles, young high school graduates can suffer from unintended consequences.
In conclusion, while the trend that taking a few years for working after high school has numerous obvious benefits, it is my belief that the drawbacks are a significant weight.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different nations in 2002. 84
- Visitors in England 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 84
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 87
- waste collection 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74529438688 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4998452968 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114357644336 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425788359955 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722362387691 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991564925685 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519062686606 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.