Beginning from the origin of human race, male and female individuals had different workspaces and directly tasks due to essentialy physical features. Nowdays these boulders are quelled and left behind, so everyone could get a job disregarding to a gender criteria. Although, as before there are being remained people with old-fashioned views, that supposes that woman schould take care of family and man should earn money and be bread winner. Personally, I think it is definitely wrong, espacially taking into account our up-to-date world. This is why I would like to provide you one generalize reoson for my opinion.
Actually, neither men nor women have any traits or skills, which disturb them to carry out one or another kind of activity. As man could be excellent nurse, as woman has all possibilities to become a distinguished scientist. The shining example is gorgeous scientist Marie Curie. She was a conventional young polish girls, but with the passion to natural sciences. Ardously, she passed an exam to medical university in Paris. After the graduation, Marie began research on radioactive elements, for what subsequently received Noble Prize in 1903. Marie Curie was the first noble laureate among women and first who won it twice in 2 different science fields. This achievement revealed that ability to any kind of demesnes is not determined by gender.
In conclusion, elimination of any gender from certain scope of activities would be not only unfair, but also irrational. These confines lead to dwarfing our development and advancement, so we are just not entitled to allow this decaying happen.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: suribright
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: NOBLE_PRIZE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize'?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...lements, for what subsequently received Noble Prize in 1903. Marie Curie was the first nobl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, regarding, so, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21538461538 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85926294968 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.723076923077 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0007885204 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125664057483 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324755378439 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486807029416 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755231046539 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00737315372195 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.