Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Disuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
In modern times, the issue of improving transporting systems has become highly controversial. There are those who say that it is compulsory to invest money on new railway lines for fast trains, however others believe that the economic sources should be used for making public transport better. In this essay, I will examine the both sides of this argument and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons why people believe that it is important to spend money on improving rails for fast trains. Perhaps, the most notable one is that fast trains are very comfortable. It has wide space for travellers to move and it is pretty quite inside of the train during travel. If a traveller prefers to travel by fast train, he or she will never choose another transport sytems because of fast trains' speed and comfortable area. Furthermore, another reason for this idea is that fast trains are safe to travel. A good illustration of this is that a research project which was completed by Ankara University academics. The research showed that the chance of accident is 0.2% for plane, 0.5% for bus, 0.4% automobiles and 0.1% for fast trains.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for the idea that economic resources should be used for improving public transport. Firstly, fast trains and their special railway lines are too expensive, so every country can not afford these. Instead of spending money on fast trains, we should improve our public transport and purchase new vehicles such as buses, trams or tubes. Secondly, people in the rural area are not concious and aware of how dangerous is fast trains. As a result of this, it is not safe to to build railway lines and purchasing fast trains. If a person who has not information about fast trains tries to cross the railway, he or she can die because of the speed of train. Normally, fast trains are able to reach to over 600km/h.
In conclusion, improving transporting systems is a complex issue with no easy solutions. Having considered both sides of the issue, I quite strongly believe that it is compulsory to spend large amounts of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. If governments implement policies about fast trains and invest the money on it, there will be less dead because of traffic accidents. Additionally, fast trains are the safest way to travel.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where elevant 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ns. As a result of this, it is not safe to to build railway lines and purchasing fast...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90640394089 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57299463475 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512315270936 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3662391426 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290623742289 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091002044159 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596944983269 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195179392027 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436828529553 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.