Technological advancements have decreased the writing and mathematical skills of the students nowadays.
Should the use of calculator and computer be limted in the classrooms or not?
Technical advancement and their rapid and wide applications have significant imapct on human beings. One of the most pressing concerns is regarding the given topic that, Should the use of calculator and computer be limited in the schools or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
Firstly, It is often argued that nowadays, students are using these gadgets at a very high rate. These advancements have serious smash on them. Because these gadgets not only decrease the mathematical and writing skills of the children but also ruin their thinking power which leads to the destruction of imagination. Students lose their creativity skills due to this they are not able to think new ideas. Actually, These advancements have direct impact on their mind. A particularly best epitome of this, a recent survey had been conducted by a newspaper named Hindustan Times which states that 8 out of 10 students are less creative only because they are using calculator and computer in their daily life.
In addition to this, It is also possible to say that due to the high usage of these technological advancements dependency of students on gadgets increasing day by day. They are not able to develop their intellectual skills which decreases confidence. For instance, In the past when these gadgets are not even invented, students solved their problems on their own behalf but at present they depend on calculators which is not a good scenrio.
In conclusion, As we have seen there are number of answers to this question. On balance, however, I tend to believe that government should pass a law under which students use these gadgets but within a limit that this could not harm their skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-29 | sandhu12 | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-06 | Prabh Deep | 73 | view |
- Technological advancements have decreased the writing and mathematical skills of the students nowadays.Should the use of calculator and computer be limted in the classrooms or not? 73
- The maps below show an island, before and after the constructions of some tourist facilities. 78
- The flowchart illustrates the production of colour plastic paper clips in a small factory. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'particularly the best'.
Suggestion: particularly the best
...nts have direct impact on their mind. A particularly best epitome of this, a recent survey had be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'advancements'' or 'advancement's'?
Suggestion: advancements'; advancement's
...o the high usage of these technological advancements dependency of students on gadgets incre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9932885906 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70665407974 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8592269396 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272794126767 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936504022055 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043362266917 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153485427984 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523231437278 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.