Television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well educated today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Whilst the staggering development in technology has provided various solutions to problems that were devastating in the past, one consequence that had a negative effect was the increasing migration from written materials towards mainstream media.
Textbooks for studying a subject in a field, fiction for entertainment, magazines for free time, this was the norm not long time ago. Bookstores were numerous and had plenty of customers, shelves full of books relating to different subjects were the staple in houses. Conversely, in present times, one can just find academic individuals wandering among the shelves of libraries while the majority of the public are either watching frivolous shows that span over unending number of episodes, whose producers cared about the graphics more than they had bothered with the complexity of the language or discussing the latest music album, the songs of which often contain more shouting or understandable words than any that can be considered creative.
It is argued that for all the previous reasons, not only are modern generations less literate, possessing a narrower selection of vocabulary and often incapable of speaking articulately, but also uninterested in learning, thus less knowledgeable of science. Additionally the young nowadays tend to pursue careers, such as singing and acting, that, except for a little percentage of those taking the path, don’t lead to the future they had imagined, which is fame and richness.
All in all, television, films, shows, festivals… etc will never be able to replace the role of books, therefore, efforts should be made to restore the interest in reading among new generations. Additionally, educational institutions have to implement new ways to attract their students towards bookstores and libraries, especially primary schools where children can be taught to love written stories from a young age. Taking this path, it might become a reality in the future to see the youth racing to get book the has been recently released.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 78
- In many countries there is a shortage of suitable people for essential jobs.What do you think are the causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it? 84
- Every year several langauges die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. 67
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia. 78
- Countires are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or a negative development. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ng, thus less knowledgeable of science. Additionally the young nowadays tend to pursue caree...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... might become a reality in the future to see the youth racing to get book the has...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'except for', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232492997199 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.173669467787 0.155533422707 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0896358543417 0.0946595960268 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.0501214627716 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0140056022409 0.0437548338989 32% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120448179272 0.122226691241 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0672268907563 0.0403226058552 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92954822181 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03081232493 0.0326793684256 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.100840336134 0.0861772015684 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0168067226891 0.021408717616 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0196078431373 0.011925033212 164% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2033.0 1933.35771543 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 316.048096192 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.41324921136 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.416403785489 0.374742101984 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328075709779 0.28420135186 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.255520504732 0.203846283523 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.173501577287 0.137316102897 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92954822181 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.037074148 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668769716088 0.56093040696 119% => OK
Word variations: 85.2822239258 60.7387585426 140% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0891783567 56% => OK
Sentence length: 35.2222222222 20.7743622355 170% => OK
Sentence length SD: 101.706306783 49.517814964 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 225.888888889 127.492653851 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2222222222 20.7743622355 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.814263465372 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 68.0297932001 49.1944974215 138% => OK
Elegance: 1.70454545455 1.69124875643 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188308504522 0.332605444948 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104169429951 0.102741220458 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0476377179405 0.0668466124924 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.657505218393 0.534860350844 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177249646692 0.148594505496 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873985106094 0.134430193775 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357923913006 0.0742795772207 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.306220449581 0.324371583561 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0473585225354 0.0638462369009 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119830583994 0.228012699653 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362701287064 0.058150111329 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.68436873747 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.4468937876 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.