The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.
The flow chart given illustrates the number of smokers out of 1000 divided by gender from 1960 until 2000. As is observed, there has always been more male users of tobacoo than female ones, however the difference in the number decreases with time.
In 1960, 600 out of 1000 men smoked. This figure fell slowly until 1970 when it started to fall more rapidly to reach 250 by the year 2000. On the other hand, the case with women was entirely different: females using tobacoo doubled in 5 years reaching 200 out of 1000 in 1965. The trend levelled off for a while then another dramatic increase followed in 1970. After hitting a peak of 300/1000 in 1975 the figure remained stable then started to gradually decrease to touch 200 per 1000 in 2000 to be slightly less than men who smoked.
Overall, smokers of both genders have shown a downward trend in recent years.
- The graphs show average temperature and rainfall in two places in South Africa 74
- Countires are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or a negative development. 67
- In many countries there is a shortage of suitable people for essential jobs.What do you think are the causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it? 84
- Television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well educated today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- In many countries there is a shortage of suitable people for essential jobs.What do you think are the causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...her dramatic increase followed in 1970. After hitting a peak of 300/1000 in 1975 the ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'then', 'while', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.177514792899 0.268076937826 66% => OK
Verbs: 0.165680473373 0.116061578633 143% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0650887573964 0.0759168565197 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0591715976331 0.0366838410393 161% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00591715976331 0.0131127313244 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.189349112426 0.155750635184 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0473372781065 0.0379272487307 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.15551467088 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0295857988166 0.0210936926555 140% => OK
Particles: 0.00591715976331 0.00175180941692 338% => OK
Determiners: 0.0887573964497 0.0948980150116 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0118343195266 0.00967000014798 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 863.0 1161.00487805 74% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.9 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56774193548 5.90752243213 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.290322580645 0.337110787985 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.21935483871 0.247514529752 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.116129032258 0.171178102325 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0387096774194 0.112407865282 34% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.15551467088 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690322580645 0.546246751206 126% => OK
Word variations: 71.1276184421 49.3433353143 144% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 19.375 23.0094962315 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.136485895 42.9750493124 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 135.714022679 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 23.0094962315 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.689975730869 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 41.310483871 47.7609492067 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.79487179487 2.94281807926 61% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41676903774 0.418131533498 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0582100779998 0.181151798455 32% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0390449675939 0.0850326197045 46% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.610830051567 0.706616315825 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.200620539586 0.157042692854 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188193349873 0.228904883108 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080013758406 0.108899403657 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.217666367463 0.367819155151 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0864995663222 0.0812612215331 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249326743802 0.316326947829 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127373676512 0.0921553760075 138% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.