The presented line graph compares the different proportion of smoking which was examined 1000 persons of both gender male and female during the fourth decades from 1960 to 2000. In general, there was a downward trend for these two types of sex, while in the first 15 years of this period, the female smoking figure had a sharp growth.
To be more specific, in 1960, whereas the number of smoking men hit the highest point at 600, this proportion of women was the lowest peak under 100 people. After that, the men smoking index continuous gradually decline year by year until the 1990s just a little under 400 persons, in addition, this ratio had a sudden drop of nearly 150 individuals at the end of the fourth decades.
On the other hand, in the early halved times, the female smoking figure significantly rose almost 200 persons and reached the highest apex at 300 people and steadily remain the constant in next 5 years between 1975 to 1980 before slightly decreased approximately 100 members in the last 20 years of the period.
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?（2018.12.01 89
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 78
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opini 84
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ale smoking figure had a sharp growth. To be more specific, in 1960, whereas th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72375690608 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34659037137 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651933701657 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3986301209 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 5.23603664747 279% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146517891065 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814323386935 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763425471311 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948084393575 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579453818867 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.