Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
It is understandable that university courses that focus on practical knowledge receive more attention from students and are more prestigious among the public than say studying gardening or physical fitness. However theses courses, that might be suffering a lack of students, can provide interesting information and are as capable of creating productive individuals.
In terms of what can learning a course give in return, many fields of science that we consider crucial today, were obsolete in the past because they were thought to be uninteresting and useless. No one was interested in biology for example until one of the few eccentric curious lot discovered the cell through his experiments opening a large door to discovering numerous facts that saved ourselves from disease and increased our lifespan.
Conversely, it is sometimes argued that many essential professions face labour shortages, therefore, focus must be put on preparing more students to become qualified so that these roles can be filled. Take healthcare for example, including nurses, doctors, surgeons...etc. The sector is suffering from increased demand but falling behind in the numbers of required staff to provide the service, consequently, creating waiting lists that reach several years in many cases.
However, one can contend that some people may later in their life enrol to a university for leisure. These will attend classes and do coursework not for the aim of getting a good career but for the excitement learning new areas can bring. It will be illogical to make it harder for them to find a place where they can study what they please.
To sum up, science and technology may be vital fields at present, but this should not mean that we have to force everyone to be an expert in them, other fields are quite important as well even if they are not considered at the moment to be comparable to technical studies. For this reason, variety should not be fought against no matter how desperate we need professionals in a special subject.
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia. 67
- Number of people on London underground. 84
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia. 78
- What opposing theories a catastrophist and a gradualist might have. 10
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980nwith projections until 2030. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...studying gardening or physical fitness. However theses courses, that might be suffering...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'in many cases', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204419889503 0.247107183377 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.190607734807 0.155533422707 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104972375691 0.0946595960268 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0414364640884 0.0501214627716 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0469613259669 0.0437548338989 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129834254144 0.122226691241 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0552486187845 0.0403226058552 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82011506616 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0331491712707 0.0326793684256 101% => OK
Particles: 0.00276243093923 0.00163938923432 169% => OK
Determiners: 0.0718232044199 0.0861772015684 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0386740331492 0.021408717616 181% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0193370165746 0.011925033212 162% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2026.0 1933.35771543 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 316.048096192 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12084592145 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38670694864 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311178247734 0.28420135186 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214501510574 0.203846283523 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141993957704 0.137316102897 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82011506616 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.037074148 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634441087613 0.56093040696 113% => OK
Word variations: 76.8508777422 60.7387585426 127% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 27.5833333333 20.7743622355 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3583163695 49.517814964 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.833333333 127.492653851 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7743622355 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 58.7011581067 49.1944974215 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.39603960396 1.69124875643 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386867928657 0.332605444948 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0871843458116 0.102741220458 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0602741879312 0.0668466124924 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.598386228897 0.534860350844 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153440836763 0.148594505496 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142725986889 0.134430193775 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747591266729 0.0742795772207 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.213788062621 0.324371583561 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0386865741872 0.0638462369009 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220679219398 0.228012699653 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381557560976 0.058150111329 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.4468937876 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.