The charts show what the history and engineering graduates were doing six months after graduating.
The two bar charts give key information about the state of students six months after graduation from two different courses in a single university, taken from two successive years.
Although a high percentage of both specialities were able to find work, engineering graduates’ stats were somewhat higher. Additionally, employment was rather higher in the second year for both. Unemployment for the historians, standing at about 5% in year one and just below that in year two, was notably less than it was for engineers, being as high as 10% and slightly increasing the following year. That could be explained by the fact that graduates pursuing higher qualifications were considerably higher in the field of history than their counterparts in engineering. At the same time taking a gap year after leaving university seems to be more common in history than engineering.
To sum up, even though, at first glance, it seems more promising to study history in terms of finding a job, the explanation may lie in the tendency of students studying history to spend additional years in further study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-08 | icecat2005 | 84 | view |
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia. 67
- There are fewer and fewer employment opportunitues for graduates entering the job market and this will have serious implications for hight education. 84
- The charts show what the history and engineering graduates were doing six months after graduating 84
- Countires are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or a negative development. 67
- Television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well educated today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'as for', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243781094527 0.268076937826 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.134328358209 0.116061578633 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10447761194 0.0759168565197 138% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0547263681592 0.0366838410393 149% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0149253731343 0.0131127313244 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.174129353234 0.155750635184 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0497512437811 0.0379272487307 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.02297105245 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0248756218905 0.0210936926555 118% => OK
Particles: 0.00497512437811 0.00175180941692 284% => OK
Determiners: 0.089552238806 0.0948980150116 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00995024875622 0.00437022459523 228% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1101.0 1161.00487805 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.9 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15083798883 5.90752243213 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73763899035 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335195530726 0.337110787985 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268156424581 0.247514529752 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201117318436 0.171178102325 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150837988827 0.112407865282 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02297105245 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648044692737 0.546246751206 119% => OK
Word variations: 64.5904303787 49.3433353143 131% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 25.5714285714 23.0094962315 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.449004359 42.9750493124 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.285714286 135.714022679 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 23.0094962315 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 52.3870710295 47.7609492067 110% => OK
Elegance: 2.29268292683 2.94281807926 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285668407493 0.418131533498 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.167800621779 0.181151798455 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0945811010473 0.0850326197045 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.65258226328 0.706616315825 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.235802352805 0.157042692854 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141851258174 0.228904883108 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043993832346 0.108899403657 40% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.215376263649 0.367819155151 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0499649841393 0.0812612215331 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181343779766 0.316326947829 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556943283429 0.0921553760075 60% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70731707317 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.