Task 1
The bar charts demonstrate a comparison in percentages from Australia between energy consumption for a variety of applications and their respective contribution towards greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. While energy use for heating of water in addition to other miscellaneous uses are the main agents towards greenhouse gases compared to other purposes, heating in terms of climate control replaces other appliances to form, together, the largest area electricity is used for.
When it comes to using energy for refrigeration, at 7% and lighting, at 4%, the corresponding percentage of their emission of damaging gases doubles to be 14% and 8%. On the other hand, heating relative emissions is virtually the same as their relative consumption of energy. Water heating and cooling however are similar when comparing how much energy used for them and how much greenhouse gases this utilisation emits which hardly different. In terms of other applications, the relative use at 15% is not entirely similar to their emissions, 28%, which is more but not as significant as it is with lighting and refrigeration.
From these charts, it can be concluded that while energy use is higher in certain areas they might not be as effective in producing greenhouse gases as some other less used areas that may make more emissions.
- Countires are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or a negative development. 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 78
- The charts show what the history and engineering graduates were doing six months after graduating 84
- There are fewer and fewer employment opportunitues for graduates entering the job market and this will have serious implications for hight education. 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980nwith projections until 2030. 67
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279661016949 0.268076937826 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.131355932203 0.116061578633 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10593220339 0.0759168565197 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0466101694915 0.0366838410393 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0381355932203 0.0131127313244 291% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14406779661 0.155750635184 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0508474576271 0.0379272487307 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01009929358 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0254237288136 0.0210936926555 121% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0550847457627 0.0948980150116 58% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0127118644068 0.00437022459523 291% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0296610169492 0.00967000014798 307% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1322.0 1161.00487805 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.9 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2358490566 5.90752243213 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349056603774 0.337110787985 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.306603773585 0.247514529752 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216981132075 0.171178102325 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169811320755 0.112407865282 151% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01009929358 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561320754717 0.546246751206 103% => OK
Word variations: 52.3206799132 49.3433353143 106% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 30.2857142857 23.0094962315 132% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.635363651 42.9750493124 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.857142857 135.714022679 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 23.0094962315 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 0.689975730869 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 60.9460916442 47.7609492067 128% => OK
Elegance: 2.19607843137 2.94281807926 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.418131533498 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.15855938867 0.181151798455 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0815383861902 0.0850326197045 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.666620175377 0.706616315825 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182366875231 0.157042692854 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.228904883108 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.108899403657 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.291614614813 0.367819155151 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101599339056 0.0812612215331 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.316326947829 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0921553760075 0% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.