In many countries there is a shortage of suitable people for essential jobs.
What do you think are the causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it?
The serious labour shortage in a lot of countries causes many concerns especially when it comes to vital professions. In order to work out solutions, factors causing the issue have to be studied first then corresponding plans can be proposed. Of these factors key ones include education required for a certain position, student interests in the field and the number of employees needed in a particular industry.
In terms of education, it is logical to have a shortage in specialities that require a high level of knowledge and skills, such as surgery and aviation industry, as not all students have the capability of enrolling in demanding and long courses, nor do all succeed in passing them. However, the financial agent may as well play a role. An aspiring person might be bright enough but not as rich to pay for tuition fees. For this reason, funding should be laid out for courses leading to jobs that suffer shrinking in the number of qualified individuals. Undeniably, not only must the money cover the university cost but also the student’s living costs.
What is more, special fields may require working for long hours or during the night which makes them unappealing. Scarcity of certain workers can manifest itself too when there is a danger associated. As in the case of police officers and soldiers. Possibly, solving this needs to increase the pay for these roles and taking specific health and safety measures, which can include taking a vaccine or wearing protective equipment.
On the other hand, labour shortage can be triggered by requiring significantly numerous employees, as how the case is with the pretentious need of hospitals for nurses. With an ageing population health service demand rises, therefore more nurses are needed. At the same time the staff should be available over day and night creating many shifts that need to be filled. The action to take in this situation is quite complicated and tracing the root cause is essential.
All in all, the agents for the problem vary and so do the resolutions. Naturally, exploring the implications for the unavailability of certain professionals is rather scary as it affects the whole structure of the community. Thus, in light of studies, new policies should be imposed and laws should be implemented to fix the imbalance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | Bhimani Nikunj | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Bhimani Nikunj | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Bhimani Nikunj | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | Amrit Randhawa | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | Eric Liu | 67 | view |
- What opposing theories a catastrophist and a gradualist might have. 10
- There are fewer and fewer employment opportunitues for graduates entering the job market and this will have serious implications for hight education. 84
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia. 67
- Television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well educated today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five european countries. 84
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'such as', 'what is more', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242352941176 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.176470588235 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.08 0.0946595960268 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0494117647059 0.0501214627716 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0141176470588 0.0437548338989 32% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112941176471 0.122226691241 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0729411764706 0.0403226058552 181% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.82331524006 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0235294117647 0.0326793684256 72% => OK
Particles: 0.00470588235294 0.00163938923432 287% => OK
Determiners: 0.110588235294 0.0861772015684 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0282352941176 0.021408717616 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0211764705882 0.011925033212 178% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2314.0 1933.35771543 120% => OK
No of words: 383.0 316.048096192 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04177545692 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378590078329 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289817232376 0.28420135186 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193211488251 0.203846283523 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143603133159 0.137316102897 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82331524006 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.037074148 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608355091384 0.56093040696 108% => OK
Word variations: 74.120093753 60.7387585426 122% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1578947368 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5032118791 49.517814964 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.789473684 127.492653851 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.814263465372 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 49.1396179744 49.1944974215 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.78431372549 1.69124875643 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427488733316 0.332605444948 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0714938791345 0.102741220458 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.051019663681 0.0668466124924 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.5096888525 0.534860350844 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136498066769 0.148594505496 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145723611484 0.134430193775 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066020666059 0.0742795772207 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350598107345 0.324371583561 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0725588938541 0.0638462369009 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267146453702 0.228012699653 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205501426471 0.058150111329 35% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.