Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Moving towards the 21st century, many people are nowadays expressing a deeply growing concern about the role of significant subjects in social development. In fact, there are some who hold firmly to their belief that students should be only able to study subjects that will be valuable in the future, such as science and technology. However, others argue convincingly that students should be free to choose their area of study if they like. Therefore, some arguments both for and against this issue will be addressed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, there are two main points for people to defend the former argument. First of all, it is a well-documented fact that if students learn these kinds of subjects, like science and technology, that can contribute visibly to society. The most obvious example to prove is that in the medical health area, inventing a new medicine must rely on advances in medical research, technology, and science. More students study these kinds of subjects will mean that there will be more people available for work in these areas. Furthermore, there is no doubt that the development of a nation, these days, highly depends on the technologically sound workforce, so students should be following the offers of the university curriculum. For instance, on the social level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can guarantee that any knowledge and skills gap in economics are covered.
On the other hand, there are two primary pieces of evidence for people to support the latter argument. First and foremost, it is commonly accepted that every person in this world is likely to have humans right, which means they are free to select subjects at the university level. A clear example to prove is that students would not learn subjects that they have no interest at all. If a student forced to learn the program while he loves literature, it can lead to failure. Equally important, there is no denying that studying from passion is more effective in most of the cases. This is supported by the fact that nobody can predict which areas of knowledge will be the most useful in the future, so students who have talents in their field can follow their passion.
All things are considered, it is my strong belief that students should be the freedom to learn what they like. Accordingly, I strongly recommend the governments should enhance people’s awareness in terms of the crucial role of education in society. If this recommendation is carried out, the comprehensive development of our future generations will be secured.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world with serious results for the environment What are the main causes and effects of deforestation 78
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using the Internet in our daily activities. 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write at least 150 words.The chart below shows the numbers of travelers at 2 train stations at different times of the day. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comp 67
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both these views and give your opinions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...no interest at all. If a student forced to learn the program while he loves literature, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ves literature, it can lead to failure. Equally important, there is no denying that stu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07925407925 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76599333572 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505827505828 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8330063952 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.684210526 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78947368421 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412339568236 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119494979588 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100866217554 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260460375467 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950340840718 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.