In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive development or negative development?
Many businessmen, nowadays, are boasting that their goods and product are uniquely new in their advertisements. They usually do this to make their product sales go higher. In my opinion, this is a positive development because it may give a competitive edge over competitors.
Firstly, giving emphasis on the newness of the products can result in tremendous sales. In other words, launching new items or the slight modification of the recent goods can attract more customers in the market. Take smartphones as an example. Android and Apple smartphones often change their present mobile with superficial alteration so that it lures the customers. As more people get attracted to the item the popularity increases. Consequently, the sales go higher thereby giving advantages to the businessman over his nemesis. Furthermore, providing truthful assurance to the public about the unique features of the items in the advertisement increases the value in some ways. Individuals often give attention to the new designs and as the number of sold items rises, it adds value to it. Thus, giving more priority to newness can have plenty of advantages.
On the other hand, a minor portion of people argues that some entrepreneurs claim that their products are different from others by merely changing their colour and assume it to be the latest model. Such faulty claim, however, is increasingly popular in some places, and it is an utter waste of time and money of people who buys them. Nevertheless, we can get rid of those falsified marketing by scrutinizing the goods properly before buying it.
In conclusion, in recent days, more businesses publicize their products are different than others in some forms. Despite some minor flawed claims, most of the businesses prosper from this trend because of the drawing people's attention and the increased popularity of the sold items.
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons 58
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Our school is the best choice for students considering a career in theatre First our school does not require an audition and encourages applicants of all acting experience levels to apply Second our students are trained in all major schools of acting meth 57
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eration so that it lures the customers. As more people get attracted to the item t...
^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... publicize their products are different than others in some forms. Despite some mino...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21523178808 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87428853489 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576158940397 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7599196563 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256653537013 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756578264028 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748469909559 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173544274285 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103632518941 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.