These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Why do you think this has happened? What are the effects of this change in attitude?
An increasing concern for many people around the world is that people prefer to throw away things which are damaged in comparison to the past. The causes of this phenomenon are varied and have led to a wide range of effects on human life. I will outline in this essay why throwing away is occurring, and discuss the impacts it can have on the world.
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons why people throw away damaged items. The primary cause of this is that products are widely available. this is due to technological advances which are used by companies. Therefore, people are more likely to throw away damaged items such as broken pot and buy a new pot instead of mending it. Another cause of throwing damaged things away is that the price of the items is cheaper than the past. When people come across items which are reasonably priced, they will reluctant to repair damaged items. The result of this is that people will buy new stuffs, which in turn leads to throw away damaged items.
The results of throwing broken items are numerous and potentially serious. Perhaps the most serious consequence is the growth of consumerism. if people always demanded for new items, it would be difficult for governments to satisfy their needs and provide the basic materials to produce new items. A second consequence is that waste items have a detrimental effect on environment. if throwing damaged items away is increased, it will difficult for government to collecting them. The result of this is pollution which is harmful for environment.
In conclusion, throwing damaged things away is an issue which will continue to demand our attention for the foreseeable future. if people pay more attention to the waste, it will have more positive effects on environment and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | pooriyaghayoomi | 56 | view |
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Why do you think this has happened? What are the effects of this change in attitude? 56
- As more and more people move to cities to find work, the volume of traffic on the roads increases. What are some problems associated with the increase in the number of vehicles in cities? What solutions could be proposed? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... is that products are widely available. this is due to technological advances which ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...nsequence is the growth of consumerism. if people always demanded for new items, i...
^^
Line 9, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ve a detrimental effect on environment. if throwing damaged items away is increase...
^^
Line 13, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...r attention for the foreseeable future. if people pay more attention to the waste,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94701986755 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58637040508 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480132450331 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0054600155 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36104094242 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124623340739 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706840686508 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228189457919 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738622526626 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.