Today, different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, there are a massive number of exceled automatically- based machines which are friendly woth people as well as supporting them in dealing with various tasks. Personally, I tend to side up with those who believing it is a benefical progress.
On the one hand, robots are blamed for several disadvantageous drawbacks. Firstly, these are believed to be digitally programmed. In other words, the amount of data and pieces of document are constantly processed by a fixed formulas established for every input information; as a repercussion, it find hardly to have the ability of flexibility and creativity as same as humankind, which leads artificial intelligent- related machines not to adapt in unpredicted issues and solve digital errors as well. Secondly, individuals seem to have to cover periodically exorbitant expenses for relevant fees. Take Vietnam is as a typical example. Today, the number of those machines used in Vietnamese households is likely not to be popular analogy with other nations since they are not willing to pay the prohibitive amount of annual money for maintainance services and repairing if necessary. This prevents them from channeling to other essential stuffs.
On the other hand, I believed that automatically- based machines play a fundamental role of assisting inhabitants in tackle variety of house chores and tasks in working environment. This is compunded by the fact that these robots may help people to measure thousands of daily activities with the absolutely correct results that was many times as fast as human do. If there were no those, it would consume a lot of time for citizens to solve many tiny and unimportant tasks. By the same token, it is also applied for manufactured plants. This is examplified by the fact that in the USA , a nation helding the lion share of the number of produced and exported goods in the world, the use of robots has been applied widely; as a results, the states of the USA stand a chance of not only saving a huge amount of compensation and Frange benefits, namely fixed salary, health insurance, holiday fees and so on, for labour force every year but also enhance the productivity, which exert a vital impact on the economic advancement.
In conclusion, for aforementioned reasons, I suppose that the application of robots and other programmed machines is a effective development.
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socailizing on social networks or banking purpose Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concert or play classical music Why Should young people encouraged to attend and learn more 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 89
- The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much in the USA 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a benefical progress. On the one hand, robots are blamed for several disadvanta...
^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'formula'?
Suggestion: formula
...ent are constantly processed by a fixed formulas established for every input information...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'finds'?
Suggestion: finds
...nput information; as a repercussion, it find hardly to have the ability of flexibili...
^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...imes as fast as human do. If there were no those, it would consume a lot of time f...
^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... examplified by the fact that in the USA , a nation helding the lion share of the ...
^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...e of robots has been applied widely; as a results, the states of the USA stand a chance o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he economic advancement. In conclusion, for aforementioned reasons, I suppose th...
^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...robots and other programmed machines is a effective development.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, i suppose, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11627906977 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02183660041 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583979328165 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.556000805 49.4020404114 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0831561400259 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023899582346 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237869537518 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475090939171 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186737985135 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.