Today, Tv channels broadcast men's sports shows more than women's sport shows. Why is this case ? Should Tv channels give equal showtime for each ?
In contemporary settings, tv channels are used to televise huge number of sports shows of male and provide them more priority instead of female shows. There are numerous reasons due to which this case is happened. Yet, there should necessity to promote equal time to these shows. Couple of view points are explained in forthcoming paragraphs.
It is worth considering that, number of male relate sports show are promoted by tv broadcasts and avoid opposite sex because of plenty of reasons. First and foremost is more priority of male in society because of empowerment. In this criteria, society provides maximum of preferability towards men because they are considered as dominant character since ancestral eras. Due to which, this leads to discrimination between gender which results to represent low characteristics of women in public. Furthermore, another prominent factor is vital demand in media, therefore superior number of men are allowed to participate in sports. Hence, they become viable to leads toward popularity which results to play crucial role in advertising skill with collaboration of business companies. Thus, youngsters become more interact towards them and prohibit valuable role of women. Hence, their outcome becomes that maximum of sports shows related to males telecast on tv channel.
On contrast, there should be necessity to change trend of this notion because of numerous certain reasons which represents favourable aspect to both, women and society. Firstly, elimination of discrimination in between genders. Because, when society provides equal importance and opportunity to females. Thus, this leads to vanish criticism regards gender specific in society. Moreover, another factor is provided superior opportunity to indicates women empowerment and status in front of public. Due to which, they become viable to participate in all business sections wheather it is sports or other which leads to progression of nation. As a result, they reveal their supreme identification and spread equality in society.
To recapitulate, from my prospective, although there are reasonable factors due to which tv channels promote such sport shows in which men is included. Yet, there are also beneficial sections regards female when they recieve equal valuable role.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 61 | view |
- Today Tv channels broadcast men s sports shows more than women s sport shows Why is this case Should Tv channels give equal showtime for each 67
- Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000
- Many people are copying celebrities from magazines and on TV Why is it happening Do you think it is good idea to copy celebrities 11
- The lines gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e in society because of empowerment. In this criteria, society provides maximum of p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...channel. On contrast, there should be necessity to change trend of this notion because ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s regards female when they recieve equal valuable role.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53714285714 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88709443658 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534285714286 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8025575798 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267344549216 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734271564807 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800000013439 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182877289882 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056458782415 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.