Tourism has negative environmental impacts on tourist areas

Essay topics:

Tourism has negative environmental impacts on tourist areas

The recreational sphere has always had an important influence on strengthening the state image on the international scene. Nevertheless, a developed tourism system may negatively affect the environmental situation in the country. This essay will discuss the main causes associated with this phenomenon and propose some possible solutions to avoid them.
Among the very current issues associated with increased tourist demand are air and noise pollution. Sustainable tourism leads to the destruction of the ecosystem through the frequent use of the traffic system causing the acceleration of air pollution by oil combustion products. For instance, according to the Vienna University of Technology, in 1997, 255 thousand vehicles left 360 kg of lead on the slopes of the nearby mountains .Thus, tourism negatively affects the flora of the host region, which can turn into an intractable ecological catastrophe.
The noise pollution affecting animals, forcing them to leave their natural habitats is not considered to be less serious consequence of the development of tourism. In addition, the construction of roads radically changes the landscape of the surrounding area, resulting in a violation of the fragile ecological balance. For example, the poll conducted by a Community of Ecologists reported that airplane noise, the most popular means of transportation for tourists, leads to stress, make travelers prone to develop cardiovascular diseases. Thereby, the problem of noise pollution is the crucial one in connection with the increase in both vehicles and large enterprises.
The above-mentioned issues could be resolved through promoting more environmentally oriented policy. A number of states are fiercely combating the problem of air pollution through forcing tourists to choose ecological fuel for their cars. The imposing of such a measure proved to be effective in Norway, where, according to legislation, tourists are compelled to use only biofuel for tanking their means of transport. The most effective way to prevent noise pollution ought to be considered the introduction of noiseless urban transport modes. Hence, the enhanced protection of interests at the legislative level may contribute to the resolution of the aspects foregoing.
Summing up, the tourism industry possess a number of costs that cannot be eliminated without performing a flexible government policy. Excluding of the environmental consequences of the tourism branch should be regarded as a primary goal of every state in the 21st century.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-13 awu212 89 view
2024-05-13 awu212 84 view
2024-05-13 awu212 84 view
2024-05-13 awu212 84 view
2024-05-13 awu212 67 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ad on the slopes of the nearby mountains .Thus, tourism negatively affects the flo...
^^
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
... on the slopes of the nearby mountains .Thus, tourism negatively affects the flora o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing them to leave their natural habitats is not considered to be less serious con...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6387434555 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16852133104 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599476439791 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 13.0 2.52805611222 514% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9466490017 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.705882353 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187021487388 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532970457477 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594035661046 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961506504577 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286282989985 0.056905535591 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.