People today know fewer of their neighbors than in the past. Why is this? What can be done to solve this problem?
Since the first communes were created people have been tending to each other, especially the ones who live nearby. However, today neighbors barely know one another, and the amount of personal information they share has decreased over the last few years. This essay will discuss the main reasons for the raise of privacy in local societies and then propose possible solutions.
In my opinion, two possible causes for such behavior are the availability of all sources of information these days and the lack of trust. The internet and new technologies significantly increased the number of content people receive every day and it causes brain overload and fatigue. For example, 90% of all the files on the global web were produced in the last decade, and humanity continues spending time there. Besides that, people do not know what to expect from their neighbors and prefer to avoid new communications and friends. For instance, according to a real estate agencies survey in 2021 only 36% of New York residents are close enough to the next-door persons. Thus, the transformations society faces, have dramatically decreased the quality of the communications between its units, and neighbors are not interested in maintaining relationships.
I believe that this problem can be solved by local outdoor events and online activities for specific districts or buildings. The more reasons for the associations the better, and joint affairs are the best option for individuals to learn each other. The barbeque party, where adults and children can participate, is the most common way to unite the neighbors and this occasion is still relevant. Online chats and groups should be considered as the modern way to share knowledge, and using new technologies erase the fears people may obtain. For instance, in my district, each high-raised house possesses its own WhatsApp chat where all the residents discuss problems and arrange meetings.
Hence, plenty of opportunities are presented nowadays to solve the issue, and the solutions may come in contemporary ways.
To sum up, society, in general, has changed and lost the points of contact which has affected the goodness of relationships they might possess. At the same time, the ones who are willing to converse are able to do so using all the occasions humanity obtains.
- Some students work while studying This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 93
- Some people say that distance learning will become the main way of teaching and learning and hence replace traditional schools in the future To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The best way to travel is travel in a group led by a tour guide To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transformations'' or 'transformation's'?
Suggestion: transformations'; transformation's
...ugh to the next-door persons. Thus, the transformations society faces, have dramatically decrea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'occasions'' or 'occasion's'?
Suggestion: occasions'; occasion's
...onverse are able to do so using all the occasions humanity obtains.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, for example, for instance, in general, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21122994652 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80106344422 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.5947004506 49.4020404114 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.647058824 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187128926391 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527135289315 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645603078584 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800908204027 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596994277666 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.