Nowadays traffic jam is main problem for many metropolitan cities around the world. This essay will discuss this interesting topic and support with examples, how this negative aspect should be reduced.
Driving to work, school, shopping or leisure become convenient and affordable way for more individuals than ever before. Nevertheless, price of petrol escalating over decades, more people chose driving as the best method of transport. Hence this more car are on roads carrying only driver, although, network of public transport as its frequency is better than ever. However, costs of public transport might reduce its attractivity between society. For example, many cities in developed countries choose the way to provide cummuters this service free of charge. It was proven, that number of cars and congestions during peak time periods have been significantly reduced.
Secondly, despite everywhere presented tools and overpriced parking slots in city centre, municipality should implement charges to entry designated areas in cities. This might also convinced drivers to choose different way of transport. Alternatively follow practice in Japan, where government set days when cars with only even or odd number plates are allowed on street. In my opinion, this is quite discrimination way how to reduce congestions in metropolitan cities, however, results from Japan showed positive impact to traffic flow.
To sum up, there is uncountable ways how to reduce traffic jams in big cities, some of them are less harmful, while some might suppress human rights.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
- These days, too many people maintain their health by relying on doctors and medicine, rather than following a healthy lifestyle.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 89
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 42
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to drive'.
Suggestion: to drive
...alating over decades, more people chose driving as the best method of transport. Hence ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...riving as the best method of transport. Hence this more car are on roads carrying onl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are uncountable ways'?
Suggestion: there are uncountable ways
...e impact to traffic flow. To sum up, there is uncountable ways how to reduce traffic jams in big citie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52282157676 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74056259845 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.692946058091 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6114554788 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.384615385 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202543024193 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649142131104 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754005207548 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132530510397 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592499323519 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.