People used to be limited in the choice for lifelong partners but currently transnational marriage has become ubiquitous around the world. It triggers some deprecating comments against this brand new form of marriage. From my perspective, the criticism is unfounded and both the couple and their children can benefit a lot from it.
Admittedly, some opponents may defend their ideas by proposing the problems during the marriage for the sake of the potential cultural shock. However, a man and a woman can hardly get married without understanding and love to each other and these two essential factors, as the precondition for a marriage, are the best tools to minimize the possible conflicts that the husbands and wives from distinctive cultural backgrounds may encounter. When the couple have already foreseen the misunderstanding or controversies in their marriage and think it acceptable from the very beginning, there is little likelihood for them to enter the church and promised to love and care each other before God.
Additionally, the whole family may have more possibilities for their future life. According to the present acts for citizenship in most countries, either part in an international marriage has the freedom to become the citizen in his or her partner’s country or at least can obtain its Permanent Residence. Resources including job opportunities, medical care or other social welfare which are only attainable for the domestic citizens then become easily available to the husband or wife. Besides, their children are naturally born in a bi-cultural background, which helps to cultivate their language abilities and flexible thinking habits since early childhood.
In conclusion, transnational marriage should not be regarded as a cursed one which brings sorrow and harm. As long as this couple is married in the name of love, the whole family will be benefited rather than suffer from the marriage.
- High school teachers spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which i 76
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary and some people think is essential for daily life. Discuss both view and give your own opinions. 84
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, then, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35409836066 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9982418928 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1683459065 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.083333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0939608139039 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377223152223 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337353671584 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675831562938 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392663781031 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.