Travel is considered to be a good way of promoting communication and understanding between countries.
How far do you agree or disagree?
Transportation is a indispensable part of enhancing relationship between different nations which assist to contribute their development. I largely agree with the given argument because it is the best way to commute from one place to another region. My stance is justified further.
To enhance the bond between different regions, visiting particular place to know about the culture and tradition. During the tour, tourist tend to learn dialect and linguistic skill. Which assist to improve the harmony between citizens from various political territory. Moreover, traditional food can be introduce their country which may experienced during tour of specific place. For instance, first language of China, Japan, India and Russia is difficult than English which creates the discrimination so that it may decline the level of understanding between them. Because of this, they may learn the tradition and culture of historical region.
Subsequently, business strategies play crucial role because, to start new start-ups with developed nation, entrepreneurs should know about the source and demand of the place. For which, they have to survey about the requirement of particular land by communating with local persons. For example, China is infamous for mosaic tiles and electronic gadgets where the use to speak Mandarin language so businessmen have to improve speaking skill to deal efficiently.
However, few ways can be overcome this situation by some kind of sources such as Internet, phone call and historical manuscripts. Surveyors and observers can also study current scenarios by using these sources as travel is not merely great way to commute for relationships.
To draw the curtain, traveling play vital role to sour bonding between inhabitants from various places. It assist to know the culture, language and cuisine of particular place. While, other than this, World wide web and cell phone also promoting harmony and understanding between them.
- Travel is considered to be a good way of promoting communication and understanding between countries.How far do you agree or disagree? 84
- Travel is considered to be a good way of promoting communication and understanding between countries.How far do you agree or disagree? 84
- Traffic on roads has become a problem in nearly every country in the world What can be done to reduce the amount of traffic at a society level and at an individual level 79
- The scientist believes that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is a positive while others think it is a negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 92
- Some people say that seeing ancient objects in a museum can give the public a unique awareness of history Others say that modern media such as films or talks on the internet provide a more effective way for the public to learn about history Discuss both t 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
Transportation is a indispensable part of enhancing relatio...
^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to learn dialect and linguistic skill. Which assist to improve the harmony between c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... tiles and electronic gadgets where the use to speak Mandarin language so businessm...
^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assists'?
Suggestion: assists
...een inhabitants from various places. It assist to know the culture, language and cuisi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88386122335 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0807144125 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116928427602 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034997973835 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338146336259 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687920560344 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384625070086 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.