Travelling to other places is good to learn new cultures. Some argue that it is just learning from books, films and the Internet. Do you agree or disagree
Many people remain a strong belief about accumulating cultures by traveling overseas. However, from my perspective, practical accessing to learn new customs seems appropriate for the following reasons:
First of all, it is noteworthy that the acquirement of quintessential cultures from discovering outbound countries takes an essential role in amending realistic cognition. Researches have shown that although it is invisible, traveling overseas creates additions to make foreigners simultaneously unknown customs in inaccessible areas. Therefore, it will be a severe mistake to overlook that the more direct observation, the more alleviation in misunderstandings between countries. It is obvious that practical experiences are attainable in the short term, conveniently utilized for subsequent journeys, and are rarely outdated. For example, when it comes to Japan, visitors seldom realize that there are diverse kinds of slippers for different purposes except coming into their house and try as a guest. This example convinces that traveling possibly provides knowledge and practical experiences in the future.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors is that traveling is suitable when people earn enough money for the journey. Instead, learning from free sources is a wonderful choice for that situation. The argument is likely to be reasonable to some extent. Nonetheless, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is which be recognized as traveling with subsidies from the government. The development of society following the formation of global voluntary organizations contains tremendous opportunities for visiting other countries without the expenditure of an amount of money. Besides, most organizations tend to the developing nations and challenging - approached areas. It is an illustration that capitalizing on associations makes learning local and particular customs feasible with less money.
In short, under no circumstances should people underestimate the necessity of direct observation from traveling to other places for the reasons mentioned above.
- Travelling to other places is good to learn new cultures Some argue that it is just learning from books films and the Internet Do you agree or disagree 89
- Schools should stop using books for teaching children as they find them boring and use films TV and computers instead To what extent do you agree with this 89
- People said that traveling to other places to learn new cultures Others argue that it is just only learned from books Internet Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9634551495 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32024112683 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641196013289 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3627618967 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161174116348 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466561341914 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446346305201 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109206502947 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408541641391 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.