In a criminal case; According to British and Australian law, A jury has no right to get information of an accused.But judging a person by his current deeds is an immoral judgement. In the absence of full knowledge about the defendant will highly favor him. Therefore; I strongly agree, a decision maker must know the full history of the criminal before giving punishment to him.
There are various types of laws followed in different nations about the jury and criminal case. But based on British and Australian government the jury has no access to get information about the accused person. This will definitely become a positive point for the criminal. As from the common sentence 'One should learn from the past' which represents past hides more information about a person. we cannot judge anyone from his present situation. For example: A multiple personality person in Europe who was caught hold on a crime spot with a weapon on hand, she was not punished for her offense instead she was hospital ordered for her health condition. This was happened by reviewing her past records.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Underground Ra 61
- GOVERNMANT SHOULD SPEND MONEY ON RAILWAYS RATHER THAN ON ROAD.TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 61
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime.Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.TO WHAT EXTEND TO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... right to get information of an accused.But judging a person by his current deeds i...
^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ut the defendant will highly favor him. Therefore; I strongly agree, a decision maker mu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dant will highly favor him. Therefore; I strongly agree, a decision maker must kn...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... criminal case. But based on British and Australian government the jury has no ac...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...come a positive point for the criminal. As from the common sentence One should lea...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... hides more information about a person. we cannot judge anyone from his present si...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 183.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95081967213 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64411994824 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 506.74238477 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6794830281 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304104587441 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112524204765 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842095676605 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222226263396 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349837716201 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.