The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is thought that the use of smart phone is as antisocial as smoking. Nicotein is forbidened in local area so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. From my point of view, in some situation i mostly disagree with this notion because of its drawbacks and unpratical for the resident life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the industrialized world and with the appearence of modern technology that the requirement of people have increase gradually, so new innovation such as mobile phone is hugely significant for the society. Not only will this phenomenon provide numerous academic knowledge, social experience and valuable information for the adolesence which improve their mentality life and cognitive systerm, but also the propotion of umemployment and homeless people can be reduced since various occupation have been created by smart phone such as youtober or tiktoker. Furthermore, the socioeconomic trouble can be narrowed with the connection of global internet which advance their economic background. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Robbin Tee, the famous interviewer and professor, which is expert about the success of postgraduates who can understand the strength of international network. The statistic demontrated that nearly everyone has got plenty of achievement in their career.
However, we can not negate the weakness of this problem for the people life. If teenagers depend too much on their mobile phone, they will reduce their independent talent, and also the creative and imagination abilities will be decrease dramatically which lead bad affection for the improvement of their country. Moreover, many government take advantage from innovation's investment for their own revenue, harmful influence will be led by this action to the young generation.
To conclude, though my agrument from the essay, i totally disagree with this statement, but mobile phone still have some negative aspects for the society. The state need to have clear plans to improve their citizens for the nation's development.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-21 tsln7607 67 view
2023-11-21 tsln7607 61 view
2023-11-21 tsln7607 61 view
2023-08-26 Phạm Phương Uyên 78 view
2023-08-25 songuyen14 89 view
Essays by user hieu13092006 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the industrialized worl...
^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...t of people have increase gradually, so new innovation such as mobile phone is hugely signific...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lenty of achievement in their career. However, we can not negate the weakness ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this action to the young generation. To conclude, though my agrument from the...
^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...plans to improve their citizens for the nations development.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91131986206 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613003095975 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.16596681 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.071428571 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153578789023 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634172158575 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089759867578 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110157982583 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694926181747 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.