The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the digital era, social media is proven to be a convenient mean of communication, slowly taking the place of direct interactions. However, everything has two side: benefits and drawbacks. In my perspective, there are more advantages of using social media to communicate than the number of disadvantage it has. Both of the two factors will be covered in the paragraphs below.
First, the downsides of using social media for communication are visible. For example, the fact that online communication could eliminate face-to-face encounter could lead to the distance between people in the real world. According to a research conducted by Harvard University, children grow up with early exposure to social media tend to be less comfortable around their loved ones. Furthermore, the reliance on social media as a mean of transmitting information will result in awkwardness in real life communication, as the human mind is not trained to adapt to less familiar situations.
On the other hands, Social media brings a great number of benefits, especially in the quality-of-life features. Communication is faster, meaning that more information will be delivered, increasing the pace of development. Furthermore, using social media will open up an endless opportunity for each individuals to connect with people around the world, without physical or geographical limitations. Explore the world has never been easier with the help of the internet and social networks. Last but not least, online connection could be utilized to set up for direct encounters, with will take noticeably less time to establish a relationships. If used correctly and responsibly, social media communication could resolve many of the external relation shortcomings in each individual’s life.
In conclusion, the benefits that online communication offer will completely cover for its disadvantages. However, people should be able to determine a responsible way to use social media, in order to mitigate all the drawbacks mentioned earlier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 67
- The table below shows information about three different types of restaurants Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a relationship' or simply 'relationships'?
Suggestion: a relationship; relationships
... take noticeably less time to establish a relationships. If used correctly and responsibly, soc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54045307443 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29324242818 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9452261697 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207648599885 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715552604514 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628681651185 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13215132803 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292737049359 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.