The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It has been claimed that due to the technological development and exploration of social media, direct interaction among the human community has been much more limited than it used to be. From a personal perspective, human relationships are indeed negatively affected to a certain extent. Not only do social media users tend to become more distant, but their psychological health may also be at risk.
The first aspect to consider regarding the unappealing features of social media concerns relationships among the human community. It can be observed that thanks to the development of technology, most people nowadays possess their own mobile devices, permitting them to connect with social media easily, which leads people to spend all their time on them. This appears to be the consequence of increasing the distance in society in not only physical angle but also mental ones. For instance, young generations prefer chatting online to having genuine meetings, which limits their ability to express their emotions such as facial expression, body gestures, and tone of voice. As this continuously persists and becomes a habit, maintaining the relationship via verbal communication will turn to hard for citizens.
Another less interesting aspect of social networking being widespread to emphasize is its influence on psychological health. It is important to be aware that the Millennials tend to spend increasingly more time on these networks such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram where they can express their individualistic sense (individualism), and once their opinions are accepted, they will feel empowered. In contrast, should they meet with opposition, a negative thought will be ingrained, which may affect their mentality and lead to bad behavior. For example, constantly drawing criticisms for their way of thinking, humans eventually withdraw from society, which can cause some psychological disorders such as depression and anxiety.
In conclusion, the prominent position that social media has in the interpersonal relationships of humans can potentially result in fragile connections and mindset. In my subjective opinion, each of us should evaluate how much time has been spent in front of a screen instead of friends and loved ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 87
- Online shopping is becoming more popular How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of work required 11
- A person spends most of his or her time at the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 78
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50432276657 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06529907744 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605187319885 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0328261398 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.428571429 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105438859 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398607856935 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473648896125 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710741963204 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486947418731 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.