The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some individuals believe that in-person communication is supplanted by the application of social media among many people in society . From my perspective, although some obvious merits can be seen in this tendency, they are, in my view, eclipsed by the considerable drawbacks.
On the one hand, there is no question that the replacement of direct interaction with social media usage has presented a number of benefits. The initial merit is that thanks to the availability of social networking sites, people now can globally connect with friends, relatives or with others sharing common interests regardless of geographical distance. For example, Instagram has applied a function of sending a follow suggestion, facilitating its users to connect and make friends with people of diverse backgrounds and personalities. Furthermore, there is a growing number of free study courses offered via live streaming service on social networking sites such as Facebook. Consequently, learners can now have free access to online classes and this has done wonders for students in terms of having better and more various sources of learning.
On the paradoxical side, among the superficial positives, I still believe there are more concerning disadvantages. Initially, as these sites are becoming more and more dominant and attract large numbers of new users every day, people are more likely to fall prey to online communication abuse, such as online bullying and harassment. For instance, it was recorded in 2017 that a Korean famous singer suicided since she was put under pressure by toxic comments from online users who body-shamed and reviled her. Additionally, the overuse of social media has been closely correlated with the growing number of health problems. As a matter of fact, the prolonged exposure to screen could fuel feelings of anxiety and isolation and also possibly cause vision loss over time.
In conclusion, despite a few benefits of the substitute of face-to-face interaction with social media, the demerits, in my opinion, are of greater significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Some people think that children should aim to be the best at what they are doing while others believe it is not necessary for them Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The map below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 11
- Is mental strength important for success in sport or is it more important to be strong and fit for success in sport Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ocial media among many people in society . From my perspective, although some obvi...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...agram has applied a function of sending a follow suggestion, facilitating its users to c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42546583851 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0030385236 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621118012422 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9996301754 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.384615385 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180021278458 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656100354508 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082267257015 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126133600894 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701211691865 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.