People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to make people drink less?
In this day and age, sugar-based beverages are being consumed by more and more people. There are a number of reasons behind this tendency and several solutions could be adopted to pacify these potential problems.
On the one hand, the dominance of sugar-based drinks can be attributable to two principal factors. To begin with, such drinks provide individuals with extra energy, increase their mental alertness and maintain focus on work and study. As a matter of fact, more and more people are living hectic lives, which require them to put greater effort in order to achieve goals, consequently leading to the popularity of sugar-based refreshment. Moreover, the increasing number of people consuming soft drinks is due to the lack of awareness and knowledge of a healthy diet and the ramifications of sugar-based drinks. Indeed, those consuming sugar-based beverages like Coca Cola or Pepsi only care about the benefits but ignore the aftermaths it might bring like the growing risk of diseases and violence or the state of being addicted.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to eradicate this problem. One possible solution to fight this menace would be the imposition of extra levy on the production and commercialization of sugar-based beverages, which would significantly increase the price of these drinks. As a result, this will have a huge impact on the number of sugar-based refreshments. Another essential measure is to raise public awareness of the importance of having a healthy diet and the consequence of overconsumption of these unhealthy drinks. For instance, more lessons on health and lifestyle could be taught in schools in order to aid students to prevent consuming unhealthy food and beverages.
In conclusion, the popularity of sugar-based drinks is caused by several factors and appropriate measures should be taken to tackle this dilemma.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 84
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le. There are a number of reasons behind this tendency and several solutions coul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34343434343 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02443877017 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1094658763 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.076923077 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270577552556 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980937863868 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674404073892 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165157533928 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609618945518 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.