Wealthy nations should assist poor countries with humanitarian relief during natural disaster. Do you agree or disagree?
In the statement given it is argued that financially stable countries should help economically weak countries during the state of emergency. This essay agrees with the statement because it is a moral responsibility to help their neighbouring countries and doing so will help them to build good relation for future references.
It is a responsibility of the country to stand for the countries in need. The country who have equipment that is necessary by the nation who is facing a national emergency they should standby them as it is their responsibility specifically the neighboring country who can easily connect with them as they are close to them. We know that Bangladesh stranded by India during the time of floods which destroyed half of the Assam.
Good contact with other nations is important. If one country stand for another in needs it will help them to build networks that can be used in upcoming time. It is seen that India’s good relations with United States has helped India during the Pandemic with necessary material like PPE kits, Medicine and others.
In conclusion, countries with good financial capital should stand up with economically week countries because it is the duty to help the nations who are facing natural disaster and it will help them to build network which can be used later.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...good relation for future references. It is a responsibility of the country to...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods which destroyed half of the Assam. Good contact with other nations is impor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al like PPE kits, Medicine and others. In conclusion, countries with good finan...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 220.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99090909091 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7646678697 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3561285977 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23416658955 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107352619775 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491335324864 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160600375998 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298243101045 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.