Countries without enough economic resources should receive aid from rich countries when they are facing natural disasters. This essay agrees with this statement because most impoverished countries do not have enough money to deal with this type of situation and these countries have a lack of knowledge when it comes to managing resources in an emergency setting.
It is known the world over that poor countries always have financial issues so they need financial aid from rich countries to overcome the problems arisen because of some natural catastrophes. In many poor countries, the government allocates more resources to give food to the population, take care of people's health and fight against some terrorist groups. In that sense, governments of these countries only have a small budget to deal with any emergency so the assistance provided by the rich countries is crucial to help people in need. A recent study found that thanks to humanitarian aid, 75% of the affected people found a place where to sleep and food to eat.
It is widely known that governments of poor countries do not know how to manage resources efficiently when a disaster happens so they need support from rich countries to get the most out of financial aid. Some developed countries face calamities each year so they have developed models and techniques to cope with these situations effectively. Countries without enough economic resources should take advantage of the knowledge of these seasoned countries to help the highest number of affected people. Recent research concluded that 100% of affected people could receive assistance if managers implement pieces of advice given by experts in catastrophes from rich countries.
In conclusion, countries with a lot of money should help countries without economic resources during natural calamities because the funds of poor countries are insufficient to deal with catastrophes and impoverished countries do not know how to manage a large amount of money during an adverse situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30218068536 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80325367912 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470404984424 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9488481123 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.727272727 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239712690015 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099272194438 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674106598903 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172244938367 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513886192375 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.