As well as making money, businesses should also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A major concentration of companies is to make a profit to better survive in a competitive world. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, I believe that businesses should make significant contributions to our society.
To begin with, it is understandable why some people subscribe to the view that to achieve success in the modern business world, firms need to earn as much money as possible. First of all, having a financial abundance would support companies to avoid experiencing regular cash flows, which can lead to some potential collapse such as going bankrupt and taking on risky debts. For example, financial stability promotes effective advertising strategies that attract a huge amount of customers. Thus, this practice is the primary driving force behind the development of corporations successfully and stand a chance to better compete in a fast-changing world. Finally, entrepreneurs who pay attention to boosting productivity to gain profits are likely to create more employment opportunities for people. As a result, reducing the rising youth employment and alleviating crime rates in society has escalated in recent years.
Nevertheless, despite the aforementioned benefits, I would contend that in terms of improving a company's reputation, Company coffers should provide financial support for community projects. Firstly, Multinational giants regularly promote their brand awareness to their customers by allotting funds to charitable donations, and environmental protection programs. In light of these actions, they always get the high credibility of a wide range of clients in the market. Last but not least, by investing time and cost into the national community campaigns. These firms would be received government assistance for small and medium-sized enterprises, especially in the period that they are encountering various challenges and obstacles in the economic crisis. Consequently, having an honest responsibility to tackle society draws back does more good than harm to business development.
By the way of conclusion, the costs involved in running a business indeed depend on profitability, so this thinking should be seen as a top priority. However, I am a proponent of making a dedication to citizens' benefits would strengthen the business existence.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 73
- Is free trade good or bad 80
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 84
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, by the way, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59195402299 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25587774033 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658045977011 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0052079566 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128292486746 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367992078912 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473430076341 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876573874437 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442027509886 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.