When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Taking occupation’s income into deliberation is the vast majority of workforce’s concern in applying for a job vacancy. I strongly agree that workers should set their money-related advance into their job priority.
To commence, obtaining fair salary based to workers’ exact capacities serves for their major further learning. Only by having a appropriate or even highly competitive rate of wages are handcraft artisans more likely to pay for their working tools and artificial devices or seize loads and loads of opportunities to leverage their work-related skills. For instance, English teaching teachers will acquire more educational psychology knowledge if they have enough money to attend in other major classes, which helps them to build up their teaching skills.
Furthermore, subsistence plays a pivotal role in workers’ thoughtfulness about their job revenue. There are all sorts of paid frustration for adults to confront with, including house’s rent fee, tax payment, and children’s tuition fee. Should the salary be insufficient, the level of pressure will impact on workers’ performance, which leads to the decrease of job quality in their business. However, there is a controversial argument that gaining high salary will affect workers' ethical traits to their job, in other words, they solely concentrate on money without any effort to level skills up. I reckon that the company bodies should set a contract with workforce by the system of reinforcing or punishing salary based on their enthusiasm and achievement after some important projects, for example.
To recapitulate, I prove that salary should be set in priority of workers’ rights because of the guarantee of their major knowledge development and livelihoods.
Le Truong Anh Khoa (267 words)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... major further learning. Only by having a appropriate or even highly competitive ...
^
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more educational psychology knowledge if they have enough money to attend in othe...
^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that salary should be set in priority of workers’ rights because of the guarante...
^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... priority of workers’ rights because of the guarantee of their major knowledge ...
^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers’ rights because of the guarantee of their major knowledge development and li...
^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elihoods. Le Truong Anh Khoa 267 words
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, i reckon, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54212454212 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03112169801 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5461167722 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839183816863 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361946437592 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284930522225 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0449600405203 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365207544104 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.