When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The enhancement of technology improves humans' lifestyle gradually. This inevitably leads to loss of certain skills and changes lifestyle of people, respectively. Some people claim that traditional skills and way of lives should be preserved. This may be reasonable, but I am of the opinion that due to technological developments, loss of some conventional abilities are ineluctable.
On the one hand, preserving traditional skills and lifestyles is vital, since traditions means culture and history. It is believed that all nations have their own traditional skills, which demonstrate culture and history, have been maintained and developed from generation to generation. A good example is Japan, which is well-known for both high technology and a place where traditions are valued and preserved. Throughout history, Japanese skills such as ceramic making and wagashi, which is a traditional skill of making cake still exist. Moreover, they are Japanese prides and admired by people around the world.
However, technological development has improved different aspects of human lives immensely. The fact is that new inventions are being implemented in order to enhance people's lifestyles. Nowadays, it is clearly seen that people are able to travel faster and more comfortably; modern equipment facilitates highly efficient production in agriculture and manufacturing. It is infeasible for humans to come to less convenient, uncomfortable, time and resources consuming methods. So, technological advancements lead to replace of traditional lifestyle by modern ones. For instance, after invention of combines plugs virtually had ceased being used in agriculture. As a result, less human force is involved in agricultural works. In addition, crops became cheaper and more affordable to majority of humanity.
To conclude, technologies have significant impact on people's lifestyle and may lead to cessation of some traditional ways of living. To may point of view, some of traditions can be preserved and kept and in certain circumstances changes are unavoidable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-01 | shanimokir | 78 | view |
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 44
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.What are your opinions on this? 73
- The diagram below shows the environment issues raised by a product over its life cycle Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting on the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...technologies have significant impact on peoples lifestyle and may lead to cessation of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the traditions') or simply say ''some traditions''.
Suggestion: some of the traditions; some traditions
...l ways of living. To may point of view, some of traditions can be preserved and kept and in certai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71753246753 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26292563101 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9256407515 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6842105263 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105444248186 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325018356088 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334827100449 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681546601438 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334759837817 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.