When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that people are now considering that the exterior of buildings is not extremely significant, while the functions of skyscrapers are evaluated as an indispensable factor in the design process. In my perspective, a building should be built focusedly to its primary using purposes. However, I still believe that the spectacular exterior of estates might also provide owners with certain benefits.
On the one hand, the main functions of estates are currently mentioned as the most vital. Apparently, it is a crucial requirement that investors should be paying attention to meet the reasonable demands of the customers. This could be implemented by means of investing in designs which might be plain, but could efficiently serve their customer’s needs. As a result, the quality of customer services will have a broad selection of opportunities for improvements, in conjunction with increase in client’s satisfaction. Moreover, it is possible that investors and contractors have much more prospects for capital recovery.
On the other hand, the positive aspects of the majestic building appearance are also extremely valuable. With the intricate design of skyscrapers, there are far more opportunities to create synchronously diverse development of related fields. It is clear that the magnificent estates often require a huge demand of various workforces coming from different occupations such as engineering, architecture, art and so on, along with the tight coordination of different experts required to bring out many innovative technologies appropriate to the sophisticated designs. Thus, this is definitely a great chance to develop their own professions.
In conclusion, although I acknowledge that the function driven structure plays an indispensable role in contemporary designs, I would still agree that the exterior features of skyscrapers should be concerned due to their intriguing advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | bqcuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have developed imagination and gain better language skills than people watching TV. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The table and pie charts show the number of research students in Australia universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Radio and Television audiences in UK, October - December 1992 67
- Radio and Television audiences in UK, October - December 1992 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6875 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37474278855 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6791700763 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778045618266 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277490726206 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353281169425 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472224895141 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381340958502 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.