Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people get their purpose in their life by receiving a suddenly good chance. I firmly disagree with this opinion and my reasons are outlined in the essay below.
Luck is an essential thing for someone to get their purpose but they must not rely on it so much. In order to achieve our target, we have to put full effort to complete the work that we are doing. For example, a lot of people in Asian countries try to satisfying their boss by building relationships with them such as invite their boss to eat out at some restaurant when they realize that they demand to have something, not by their effort in their job.
During the jobs, they have to also make a fixed plan to complete their aim. Making a careful plan step by step from smaller to bigger targets with details of their work will be helpful. For instance, business manager in some company have to set a plan to develop or maintain their business and makes more profits.
However, when somebody is given a chance to do something, it is luck. In this case, the receiver has to try to do himself as much good as possible in order to be thankful to those who gave him a chance. The fixed plan provides us an obvious aim but during getting this aim, we have to change our plan when it is needed.
In conclusion, getting our purpose needs us to put full effort into the work that we want to do and the obvious plan is needed too to direct us simply to our aim.
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays most countries improve the standard of living through economic development But some social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of this phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.31439393939 5.12529762239 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19746271898 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5342805539 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9166666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161361944001 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647354472884 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299056792811 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889206194012 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246770202894 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 12.4159519038 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.