Which one do you prefer: working for one company all your life or working for several different companies in your life?
Write an essay to present your ideas. Provide relevant examples if necessary.
Some people feel that they should work for the same firm their whole lives, while others believe that they should change jobs periodically to work for new companies. In my opinion, working for a variety of businesses appeals to me, and I honestly feel that working for several firms provides us with additional benefits in our life.
On the one hand, employees who have been with the company for a long period will be considered for advancement on the corporate ladder since they have the greatest experience and talent. Besides, companies always tend to value loyalty as the utmost importance criteria in their culture and business. Therefore, they usually reward loyal workers for their contribution such as long service award after 10 or 15 years working with General Electric corporate as an example. Furthermore, corporations are keen to retain these skills as precious assets from being lost to brain-drain, ensuring that the employee's career is safe. However, a monotonous working environment and daily procedures would be an issue for workers to concern.
Nonetheless, I advocate those who have worked for a variety of firms throughout their life. Proponents of job-hopping tend to point out potential merits of individuals' independence and varying skills. With respect to the former, if job hoppers try their hand at different jobs, they would become more independent. This is because they have opportunities to collaborate with more colleagues and adapt to various work environments, which motivates them to be flexible and stand by themselves. Regarding the latter, employees can acquire a variety of skills to become more versatile. To illustrate, several executives have been working in different fields, and big corporations, thus, offer them job opportunities with a lucrative income now as they are incredibly knowledgeable in all related fields.
To sum up, I believe that both options have merits. Although some entrepreneurs prize insight into a specific area of work and loyalty, I am inclined to feel that individuals should change employment because of the benefits of growing self-reliance and skill in a variety of sectors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, honestly, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3137829912 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96324407339 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595307917889 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4759200689 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21334806787 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699943384176 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646243065773 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124906310104 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675246406265 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.