While it is believed that students should study together, others would argue that they should study unaccompanied. I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, studying in a group can be useful. Students can support each other, such as doing homework, solving difficult questions, setting goals for the better. These things can enhance the group’s relationship or even motivate the students to study. For instance, there are many team activities in school, which form students into a group to study together. Therefore, those who study have to cooperate with others to produce the best result.
On the other hand, although there is no doubt studying in a group can be effective, I believe that studying alone is still the best. Firstly, studying unaccompanied can help oneself focus on their homework, minimize the surrounding distraction. This way those who study can not be distracted by other people. Studying together can be distracting, frequently study sessions can turn into hangout sessions due to the fact that there are many things to talk about with their friends. For example, students who study alone can pace themselves, focus on their homework instead of talking off-topic things with their friends. Secondly, those who learn alone can set their own rule. Pupils can have their own studying schedule without having to worry about anyone else’s. Moreover, they can learn and study anywhere they like. Studying in a group can have its disadvantage because different pupils have their own schedules. Sometimes, it can’t be matched.
In conclusion, while it is true that studying together can be efficient, yet it is more practical to study alone.
While it is believed that students should study together, others would argue that they should study unaccompanied. I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, studying in a group can be useful. Students can support each other, such as doing homework, solving difficult questions, setting goals for the better. These things can enhance the group’s relationship or even motivate the students to study. For instance, there are many team activities in school, which form students into a group to study together. Therefore, those who study have to cooperate with others to produce the best result.
On the other hand, although there is no doubt studying in a group can be effective, I believe that studying alone is still the best. Firstly, studying unaccompanied can help oneself focus on their homework, minimize the surrounding distraction. This way those who study can not be distracted by other people. Studying together can be distracting, frequently study sessions can turn into hangout sessions due to the fact that there are many things to talk about with their friends. For example, students who study alone can pace themselves, focus on their homework instead of talking off-topic things with their friends. Secondly, those who learn alone can set their own rule. Pupils can have their own studying schedule without having to worry about anyone else’s. Moreover, they can learn and study anywhere they like. Studying in a group can have its disadvantage because different pupils have their own schedules. Sometimes, it can’t be matched.
In conclusion, while it is true that studying together can be efficient, yet it is more practical to study alone.
- While it is believed that students should study together others would argue that they should study unaccompanied I agree with the latter view On the one hand studying in a group can be useful Students can support each other such as doing homework solving 56
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, talking of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21111111111 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63698761918 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1651718683 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1666666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94444444444 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.609331921591 0.244688304435 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215155872221 0.084324248473 255% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110855631021 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.423112995833 0.151304729494 280% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121444662266 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.