Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of resources
In contemporary society, lack of accommodation for wild animals as well as the dispensable role of them become contentious topics in various parts of the world, While many people believe that in the 4.0 Industry, the place for wild animals can become non-exist and there is no need of projecting them. Nevertheless, I maintain that projecting animals can mitigate some potential problems related to the disappearance of wild animals. This following essay shall outline the main supporting points for my opinion.
To begin with, a lot of areas of forests are replaced with construction sites to meet the accommodation requirements of people boom. Indeed, large metropolises contribute to a decline in the number of hectares forests by cutting down trees or poaching predators to bring life with a certain degree of peacefulness. In addition, the extinction of many species stems from global changes due to some industrial activities of humans. In other words, high temperatures can result in forest fires; as a result, a variety of animals die out. According to an Oxford survey, approximately 65% of global wild animals are in danger, and just over 45% of them are extinct.
On top of that, projection ways play indispensable roles because they have huge beneficial influences on animals for several reasons. For example, the conservation of animals can be considered as the route to fulfillment in later life. This is due to the fact that existing side by side between human beings and wild animals can ensure the natural balance of all creatures on the Earth effectively. Making projecting plans is an urgent task but never being unnecessary. If only one specie still appeared, the government would pay a great deal of effort to protect them. According to a Biology Club, roughly 15% of endangered animals were saved and took care of. This can lead to the future prosperity of natural habitats.
To sum up, wild animals are facing the lack of accommodation in the 21st century, conservation policies play vital parts for all life on Earth. I suggest that the government should organize some voluntary clubs to help some endangered species nowadays.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 89
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled They may control the number of children someone has through taxes Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in thi 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... help some endangered species nowadays.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10764872521 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93047406704 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600566572238 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6304798944 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.058823529 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203309041363 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585441402261 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594543385067 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120955010659 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286408195753 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.