Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?
It is generally agreed that teaching has a pivotal role in graduation quality in all universities. Professors who instruct the material of courses define this quality and directly impact it. Teaching style and method is a master key in instructing evaluation and understanding of the courses and the professor is the bottleneck of it. Some students prefer to take a course and gain knowledge from different instructors, however, others are against this idea and believe that examined teachers are better than the new one. Although it is hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I do believe that taking a course with a professor that already passed the course with them is a better decision. The following reasons would elaborate on my idea.
To commence, one of the main criteria that have a big impact on teaching quality is teaching style. It is clear that the way that instructors choose to transfer the concept of course material is a master key in teaching. In addition, a clear teaching structure helps students to follow the material and get involved in the classes. For instance, I took a course in mathematics last year and the professor always asked questions to compel students to take part in a discussion in order to understand better. Indeed I like to take another course with that professor. Also, I am pretty familiar with the criterion for getting a good mark in the class.
As time passes and students become closer to graduation they become more aware of the final mark important to finding a good job in the future. We know that when you are familiar with a professor based on previous experiences, you can get a better result in the course based on those experiences. To put it in general words, you pretty much know what he/she wants for homework, and also the criterion for the final mark. I remember when I passed a course in chemistry, I found that the professor persist in homework and assigns a big part of the final mark to them. It is crystal clear that when I take another course with that professor, I try to present HomeWorks in the best way.
Last but not least, all instructors refer to the previous courses that they taught and there are no exemptions. When we take a course with those professors we almost know part of the new course and it would be familiar to us. For instance, they almost say in the previous session, in the past course, and so on. Therefore, when we took a course with them before, we know what they mention.
Drawing upon the reasons, although some exemptions are excluded from general rules, I believe that taking courses that are taught by instructors whom I have already passed classes with them is a better option. This decision, not only helps me to understand the material of the course but also assists me to get a better marks in the course.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | ahad_mohammadi@ut.ac.ir | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | ahad_mohammadi@ut.ac.ir | 56 | view |
- Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before Why 75
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 76
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...scussion in order to understand better. Indeed I like to take another course with that...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks in the best way. Last but not least, all instructors refer to the previous co...
^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the past course, and so on. Therefore, when we took a course with them before, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in general, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 62.0 24.0651302605 258% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 495.0 315.596192385 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68686868687 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62389948071 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430303030303 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.397062637 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.869565217 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330633845164 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938047912301 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746642797666 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181864012042 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192231314985 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.