Writing IELTS task 2 - "Throw away" Society
These days people in some countries are living a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are the causes and problems?
In recent years, many devices been used up a few times and unceremoniously dumped afterwards have become an increasingly popular trend. There are a number of reasons for this trend, which is having a significant impact on both the environment and on the community as a whole.
The predominant factor resulting in throw-away society is the prevalence of science and technology. In fact, thanks to the technological advances and digital devices, many companies have directly competed each other in generating an enormous amount of diverse products which bring state-of-the-art utilization and glamour model to consumers. For instance, Steve Jobs’ company has created a series of iPhone devices that the more be the most cutting-edge one made, the more its differences with older ones are major. Another cause of this is that modern objects have a cost which is relevant to the payment of consumers, and this has resulted in many can easily own gadgets while their function and quality are drastically improved. In other words, individual can possess many objects at the same time, meaning throwing away more unfavourable ones will ensue.
This tendency could have negative consequences in terms of both society and environment. A negative factor is that using many high-tech devices as well as personal gadgets can contribute to waste on money and further natural resources, thereby crucially depending upon supporting objects. An important concern for expenditure on things in a short time is that whether technological devices or household appliances has also played a vital role in increasing a large number of rubbishes which has become an extreme difficulty with the government and environmentalist in tackling them. Plastic, for example, is one of materials which ought to take hundreds of years to decay.
In conclusion, there are dangers in the exhausted non-renewable resources and the increasing environment issues from fritter-away objects and the causes of this phenomenon should be addressed gradually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-10 | Nguyễn Đinh Tiên Hoàng | 89 | view |
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advanta 61
- Writing IELTS task 2 - "Throw away" Society 89
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ays people in some countries are living a 'throw-away' society, which m...
^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... also played a vital role in increasing a large number of rubbishes which has become an extreme d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42608695652 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14793017684 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597101449275 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1400075383 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.714285714 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151623152272 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529468569853 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088286174715 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933528302869 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107899575996 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.