You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the
following topic:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with
examples and relevant evidence.
Television or newspaper are two of national method to inform information for people. Therefore, it does need some characteristics such as certainty, formality and fastness. Being an editor is sometimes stressful due to decision of publishing a news but they should understand how important to balance the terrible and terrific information to be broadcasted.
There are two conditions to make up an informative news. First is the character of the information. Usually, humans tend to be attracted to bad news over good ones. Hence, shocking news are regularly more favored than the good ones. For example, readers will unintentionally pay more attention to an earthquake, a storm or a flood in order to survive. Second is reader's curiosity. It is a human personality, so people are likely to care about other people’s secrets, especially the celerity. Consequently, rumors and spoilers of a singer which easily stimulate reader’s interest is frequently printed on the cover.
There is a debate whether they should present more negative news or positive bulletins should be prominant. Even though bad news is appealed more views, it is not always the center of the Earth. It does create some worry and gloomy sensation but it is still a must-have information to build people's caution about life. Instead of writing all those mentioned above, happy ending ones should be concerned to broadcast more by the journalists to balance the information for viewers. The nice stories will help people optimistic and realize that life does not only contain the crimes, the calamities and the terrors but also many amazing things people willing to do for each others.
In conclusion, the media team should weigh the pros and cons before reporting the bulletins. Equalizing those bad and good news a make people love each other and enjoy their life more without forgetting being warned by the negative news.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 89
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chartshows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how peoplethink the costs of adult education should be shared 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terrific information to be broadcasted. There are two conditions to make up an i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'informative news'.
Suggestion: informative news
... There are two conditions to make up an informative news. First is the character of the informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91169873835 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600649350649 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4804258534 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714018249782 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023615994621 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197029807334 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435297747758 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174544404147 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.