You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, advocating public transport has become an emphasis on reducing air pollution caused by traffic. There are several reasons regarding most people rather driving their own car than taking public transportation, such as trains. For the majority of people, it’s considered as the fastest and most convenient way to travel from place to place. However, as a member of the young generation, who cares for the future of earth, I believe the funds on transportation should be spent on railways which have greater benefit for earth rather than on roads, the major source of air pollution.
First of all, the more people taking the train as a way to commute means less cars would be seen on the road, and of course, this leads to reduction of carbon dioxide. Furthermore, the fund spent on the railway shouldn’t be limited to daily rail care, but also for promoting railway transport, for example, discount on monthly tickets could encourage more citizens to take the train for the sake of money-saving. Imagine a train full of 400 passengers, which would be at most 400 cars less on the road a day, and 146000 cars less for a year.
People of this generation all carry the burden with highly stressed work, house mortgage and bills to pay, insomnia has become a common symptom for people who suffer from anxiety and stress. In addition, taking the train to work could be one of the solutions to make our lives a bit easier. It takes me at least two hours to go to work everyday. During my stressed and sleepless nights, long-distance travelling by train becomes a lifesaver, when I can steal a little time for napping, or even reading. Not only will the train be a more budgeted choice on travelling, in the long run, it also can be a relaxed way to commute.
Generally speaking, if the government spent more money on trains, it would do citizens more good than harm, the money should be spent the right way so that humans and earth can have a win-win situation.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by the level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by select 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing the train as a way to commute means less cars would be seen on the road, and of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...kes me at least two hours to go to work everyday. During my stressed and sleepless night...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, at least, for example, in addition, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59287311072 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582608695652 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6379151794 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.615384615 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5384615385 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0893703353807 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296509523817 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03366552672 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619641600809 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294331792807 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.