5/11
It argued that environmental protection is one of the problem very difficult and trouble, so the only national organization can solve this problem. I completely disagree with the opinion.
I believe governmental play acritical in environmental protection. They can hold the program to raise public's awareness of protecting habitat. For example, student imparted knowledge relate fighting climate change, global warming and greenhouse effect in the school. The serious damage and solution should be broadcast propaganda on electronic media such as tv, radio, internet. Furthermore, the administration can enact the laws to severely penalized contaminate behavior and to reward behavior protection environmental.
On the other hand, the citizens have a direct impact on this problem. Firstly, what citizens need do is preserve polluting actives. People reduce releasing pollutants into the habitat. The waste must be treated before it is discharged into the air and water. If people cut down trees legally and plant new trees, the natural resource will be not depleted. Secondly, the people use eco-friendly alternatives. The plastics are very difficult and time-consuming to deposited. Instead of, We use plastic shopping bags, we should use paper shopping bags. Using renewable energies such as wind, hydro and solar power is the effective solution.
In conclusion for the reasons I mention above, I strongly believe that not only a national lever have abilities solves but also human activities and governmental help improve quality's life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-05 | quynhnhu | 11 | view |
| 2017-11-04 | EugeneDubinchuk | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63519313305 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02058732055 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.690987124464 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2085189529 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2352941176 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7058823529 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.84 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.