Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The machinery automation has been made people better off in many situations, especially on the field of labor intensive industry. Connected with this comes with the discussion on the reducing working hours of the labor who are working in these industries. However, in my opinion, the idea has not thoroughly considered the serious consequences that can incurred to our economy and society.
Firstly, the idea does have negative influences on our economy. Reducing working hours is one thing, salary downturn is another. At first, people who does not make enough money and would perhaps cut down the non-necessary expenditures like watching movie. The revenue of these kind of businesses would be inevitably impacted and start lay off their employee. This ripple effect would go on other sector of business and finally affect the whole economy. The devastating result on economy cannot be ignored.
Besides, the negative effect on our society can be underestimated. Technology automation has been widely adopted in many mission critical industries. Thinking of the nuclear power factory, computer is controlling all processes and their employees only need to do some routine checking on the nuclear system. Reduction of working hour means that fewer worker or even no people supervise the system. What if the computer run out of control can be catastrophic, no people can take the immediate action to rectify it. It is hard to imagine that the power supply to the hospital is abruptly stopped. It is matter of life and death and is unaffordable to the whole society.
Admittedly, reduction on working hour is appealing to all workers. However, we cannot turn our eye blind on the undesirable effects to our economy and society as stated on above. Personally speaking, reduction of the working hours should not be the outcome of machinery automation. Manual labor should make used of their free time given by the automation to update their own knowledge and technique on the working field instead of simply getting off work earlier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-22 | shivangi patel | 61 | view |
- It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. Include any relevant examples from your experience. 84
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos. 84
- Telecommuting refers to workers doing their jobs from home for part of each week and communicating with their office using computer technology. Telecommuting is growing in many countries and is expected to be common for most office workers in the coming d 84
- In what ways has information technology changed work and working practices in the past 10 years 55
- Over population of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...res like watching movie. The revenue of these kind of businesses would be inevitably impac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'kind of', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236263736264 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.175824175824 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0824175824176 0.0946595960268 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0659340659341 0.0501214627716 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0384615384615 0.0437548338989 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107142857143 0.122226691241 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0659340659341 0.0403226058552 164% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76614718479 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0247252747253 0.0326793684256 76% => OK
Particles: 0.010989010989 0.00163938923432 670% => OK
Determiners: 0.0989010989011 0.0861772015684 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0302197802198 0.021408717616 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010989010989 0.011925033212 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2040.0 1933.35771543 106% => OK
No of words: 330.0 316.048096192 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18181818182 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.406060606061 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315151515152 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224242424242 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130303030303 0.137316102897 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76614718479 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.037074148 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.56093040696 99% => OK
Word variations: 60.4224244044 60.7387585426 99% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6726892303 49.517814964 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 127.492653851 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.814263465372 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 48.0151515152 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.46078431373 1.69124875643 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242832003154 0.332605444948 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105587424089 0.102741220458 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0814373954001 0.0668466124924 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.481197615788 0.534860350844 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14243741089 0.148594505496 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909168463542 0.134430193775 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357093799566 0.0742795772207 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368779763931 0.324371583561 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0419053688361 0.0638462369009 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17191340915 0.228012699653 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310263478075 0.058150111329 53% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.68436873747 35% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 1.9629258517 357% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.