A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans,(opposing opinion) while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The rapid development of technology has changed the relationship between human and some kinds of animal, thinking the relationship that the horse has been replaced by car to human as a media of transportation. However, the state of the art technology has not extended its benefit to all kinds of animal, leading to the discussion on whether should humans use these kinds of animals on their own benefits. People are quite divided and this essay will discuss both sides of compelling arguments.
On the one hand, peoples advocate the use of animals based on two reasons. Firstly, poultry is essential source of food to humans. Without animals, starvation will properly happen on everywhere, especially in the third world country. Another argument is that many drugs can be tested on mice and monkey before safely taking to human. The success of the drug invention can save many human life, even to animals itself. Therefore, exploitation of animals by human is a perfectly acceptable among the supporters.
On the other hand, opponents believe that animals do have life as same as human beings and animal should share same rights as mankind. The first persuasive argument is that human actually no longer need poultry as a staple food to survive because our technology advancement has already made a biggest stride on agricultural industry to grow ample amount of vegetables, hence, enough food to share all human beings. In addition, scientists have further confirmed that vegetable is a more healthier option than meat. Therefore, there is no point to use animals as a food to humans. Another argument against the supporters is that most of the animals are not used in drug testing, but cosmetic research instead. This is ridiculous to sacrifice other life just because of our beauty.
Personally speaking, until such time as computer can accurately simulate animal biological behaviors, it would be perhaps inevitable to use animals on drug testing as the research can benefit not only human, but also animal itself. Other than that, humans should stop using animals on their selfish actions. I strongly hope that, in one day, all kinds of animal, including mankind, can live peacefully and together create a utopia.
- To what extent is the use of animals in scientific research acceptable? 91
- University education should be free to everyone, regardless of income. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be mad 73
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos. 84
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...se has been replaced by car to human as a media of transportation. However, the state o...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...a media of transportation. However, the state of the art technology has not extended its benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...technology advancement has already made a biggest stride on agricultural industry...
^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...e further confirmed that vegetable is a more healthier option than meat. Therefore, there is n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
...re, there is no point to use animals as a food to humans. Another argument against the...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'in addition', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264197530864 0.247107183377 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.133333333333 0.155533422707 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0864197530864 0.0946595960268 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0765432098765 0.0501214627716 153% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0222222222222 0.0437548338989 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138271604938 0.122226691241 113% => OK
Participles: 0.041975308642 0.0403226058552 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68859353586 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0320987654321 0.0326793684256 98% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0913580246914 0.0861772015684 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0271604938272 0.021408717616 127% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2225.0 1933.35771543 115% => OK
No of words: 364.0 316.048096192 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11263736264 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392857142857 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315934065934 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192307692308 0.203846283523 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118131868132 0.137316102897 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68859353586 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.037074148 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 62.9619496008 60.7387585426 104% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2222222222 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1958277351 49.517814964 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.611111111 127.492653851 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.814263465372 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 51.8156288156 49.1944974215 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.91489361702 1.69124875643 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322742924201 0.332605444948 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0706126245551 0.102741220458 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0794149529839 0.0668466124924 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.487807175527 0.534860350844 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150296294405 0.148594505496 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123303797125 0.134430193775 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572626678453 0.0742795772207 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.374728922214 0.324371583561 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0665476876235 0.0638462369009 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225577769354 0.228012699653 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237134342032 0.058150111329 41% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.