All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion.

Instead of using fuel-forced cars, people are concerning replacing them with electric ones. I strongly agree with this statement due to their potentials which provide a friendly environment as well as saving money in the long run.

Electric cars have earned a good reputation for their environmentally friendly outputs. Firstly, little greenhouse gases have produced by the electric-forced engine system, whereas burning fuels create a lot of hazardous emissions and the extra filter is needed. Furthermore, a completely different power-generating system has enabled them to operate silently. For instance, the first generation Tesla had shown dramatically less noise (50 decibels when stationary), in contrast to statistically average output in fuel-forced cars (80 dB), which is one thousandfold quieter.

Another principle reason for this is about the budget. In order to generate power for vehicles, most fossil fuel cars can only provide up to 40% efficiency when converting to electricity. While electric cars use more than 98% which means the latter eliminates much more unnecessary waste on energy and heat. On the other hand, governments are likely to advocate those who are willing to replace their worn cars by increase the tax on petrol and diesel. For example, one biggest motorcycle company Gogoro has dominated the market by their competitive price and government support, combining several economical monthly contracts on electric usage.

With the less carbon footprint and a huge budget saver, I believe that electric cars will highly replace the traditional ones.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...stead of using fuel-forced cars, people are concerning replacing them with electric ones. I st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56611570248 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98098898606 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698347107438 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4513616971 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201594558164 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709314046904 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410127867291 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120317071464 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011203025697 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.