Nowadays, the economy has been developed significantly in some countries. Although this results in improving the quality of life especially in central business districts, it does not help in the rural areas. If we consider it from a long-term perspective, this situation would cause some problems such as overpopulation in urban areas and shortages of resources in the countryside. These problems should be taken into account by governments and prevented before it is too late.
Overpopulation undoubtedly brings a variety of further problems, for example, overcrowding lifestyle, traffic congestion, and unemployment. Even though the city dwellers may have abundant resources and convenient services, it still takes a lot of time to wait for other users. Sharing the highways with a great number of vehicles would also cause more chances of accidents. A high demand for jobs opportunities is one of the main issues that difficult to deal with.
In the country, due to the great number of adults moving out, the suburbs often lack labourers and professionals. If the people who are strong and productive all move into urban areas, the rest of the elderly and the children would not have the capacity to work on the land in order to grow grains and vegetables. Furthermore, it is also hard to receive a good quality of education and medical care. The shortage of food and professionals is also considered a problem by the unorganized economic development.
To deal with these problems, governments should pay more attention to remote places, for example, encouraging people to take part in the development of rural areas by providing more extra income or reducing the taxes. Considering the importance of the urban areas is equal to the other, it would help tourism and other industries not only in the cities but also benefits the countryside.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. 61
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion. 84
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0284190962 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9047949368 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178190697069 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053322133165 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524644155786 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098694201549 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585269994752 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.