Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy or is it the price of their fame on invasion in their private lives? Give your opinion.
Now a day, media have become one the major pillars of any democratic system as it covers all aspects of life. We often see celebrities like Politicians, Actors, Models and Players on television, radio, Facebook and newspapers. Many people are of the view that famous people are treated unfairly by the media because of excessive coverage and privacy should be given to them. Whereas, some refute this concept and proclaims that it is the price of their fame. Both points of view will be discussed in order.
On the one hand, we always find electronic, print and social media on toughs to cover maximum information about celebrities. Therefore, whatever they do is always in the news. Thus, they are left with no privacy whatsoever. For example, the media have always been after the Politicians, whether, they are giving a speech, going for a talk show or on the way to a family trip. Furthermore, same is the case with Actors and the Models. Likewise, media is always there to capture them, if they are on the shooting, off the camera and even in commercial markets or other public places. Moreover, it is often witnessed in Pakistani media that the news of celebrities personal lives are on aired without getting it endorsed from that particular celebrity.
on the other hand, It is believed by many that almost every person in the present society wants fame and publicity. In addition, it can be explicitly seen in auditions for acting, as thousands of candidates used to stand in lines to be on camera. Certainly, most of the people desire to be in the news, so that public might renown them. For example, Pakistan Idol a singing reality show launched by a leading media house i.e. Geo News a couple of years ago. Consequently, more than 500,000 youngsters approached for auditions. In other words, everybody wants fame no matter how much sacrifice he/she has to make. Nevertheless, the people who become famous may not claim the privacy from media as they have adopted this choice by themselves.
In a nutshell, after analyzing both perception, In my opinion, people work for their lives for glamour and fame and once they get it, then, they should not avoid excessive media coverage as its primary job of media to gave importance to the celebrities of the country. Though, It is recommended that media should also be careful and must not indulge in personal lives of celebrities because they are human beings as well.
- Some businesses prohibit smoking in any of their offices Some governments have banned smoking in all public places Do you agree or disagree that this is the right course of action Give reasons for your opinion 63
- Happiness is considered very important in life. why is it difficult to define?what factors are important in achieving happiness? 78
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of giving international aid to poor countries 78
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own idea's (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. 78
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both views and give your opinion 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...sed from that particular celebrity. on the other hand, It is believed by many ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'furthermore', 'if', 'likewise', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in my opinion', 'in other words', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.250988142292 0.247107183377 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.138339920949 0.155533422707 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0632411067194 0.0946595960268 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0573122529644 0.0501214627716 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0612648221344 0.0437548338989 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.150197628458 0.122226691241 123% => OK
Participles: 0.0395256916996 0.0403226058552 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58479215774 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0197628458498 0.0326793684256 60% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0849802371542 0.0861772015684 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0177865612648 0.021408717616 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00592885375494 0.011925033212 50% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2608.0 1933.35771543 135% => OK
No of words: 447.0 316.048096192 141% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83445190157 6.12580529183 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.20517956788 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.374742101984 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230425055928 0.28420135186 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.149888143177 0.203846283523 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10514541387 0.137316102897 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58479215774 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.037074148 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525727069351 0.56093040696 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 60.9206886575 60.7387585426 100% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0891783567 155% => OK
Sentence length: 17.88 20.7743622355 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2885578713 49.517814964 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.32 127.492653851 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.88 20.7743622355 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 40.9225055928 49.1944974215 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.71538461538 1.69124875643 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448382388334 0.332605444948 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0666803105391 0.102741220458 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0698731129274 0.0668466124924 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.45034266976 0.534860350844 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175134241147 0.148594505496 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150408175001 0.134430193775 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146054465796 0.0742795772207 197% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375919986526 0.324371583561 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.01730994033 0.0638462369009 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.369889180063 0.228012699653 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219515701009 0.058150111329 377% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.41683366733 351% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.