art works
People have different views about the financial funds that assist creative artists. While some people argue that the government should pay money for artworks, I believe that money for art projects should come from other sources.
On the one hand, there is a common belief that the authority should give financial support to art projects
because of two key reasons. Firstly, the art fosters spiritual values that play an important role in the human’s life. For instance, people can derive deep pleasure from hearing lovely songs after a tiring workday. Therefore, the state should pay money for art projects. Secondly, the art also plays an integral part in preserving and developing nation’s culture. A clear illustration is that the country can have great masterpieces if the government spend a large huge of money on creative artists.
On the other hand, I would strongly endorse that the funding for the arts should come from other financial sources. The first supporting point for this view is that the state budget should be spent on other more vital concerns such as education or economy, all of which are of paramount importance for building a powerful and prosperous nation. Moreover, the art is becoming commercial products that can create a huge profit. For example, some great pictures can be sold at a hundred of million dollars. Thus, it is absurd for the government to pay money for artworks.
In conclusion, although there are some reasonable arguments in favour of the idea that the government should pay money for artists, it seems to me that art projects should be assisted by other alternatively financial sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-22 | Hanachan123456789 | 73 | view |
| 2017-01-26 | ngochoa.utc | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11481481481 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66622681558 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551851851852 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7582685892 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139025324382 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651140591027 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591188904037 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989495354629 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292134058656 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.